Abstract: Unprecedented large-scale silent slip was inferred from the movement of the
earth's surface by GPS measurements in 2001 in the Tokai region, southwest
Japan. Evaluating whether such movement is uniquely connected to the
expected Tokai earthquake, or whether it repeatedly occurs in this area and
is thus not clearly precursory becomes vitally important. Because of the
short history of GPS observations and the limited land coverage
surrounding the tectonic plate boundary beneath Suruga bay, we take
advantage of continuously recorded seismicity that is presumed to be
sensitive to the deformation at the depth at which large and great
earthquakes nucleate.
Together with the well-maintained NIED earthquake data, we employ the
seismicity-to-stress inversion approach of rate/state friction to infer the
Changes in tress with time and location in and around the presumed
nucleation zone of the future Tokai earthquake.
But how can this—or any—such forecast be validated? The long historical record in
Kanto affords a rare opportunity to calculate the probability of shaking in an alternative
manner, based almost exclusively on intensity observations. This approach permits robust estimates for the spatial distribution of expected shaking, even for sites with few
observations. The resulting probability of severe shaking for an average 30-yr period is
~35% in Tokyo, Kawasaki, and Yokohama, and ~10% in Chiba, in good agreement with
our independent estimate, and thus bolstering our view that Tokyo’s hazard looms
large.
Mapping stress changes inverted from microseismicity year by year, we find
that the stress under Lake Hamana, the western expected future Tokai
source, has been decreasing since 1999, during which the GPS data showed a
normal trend characteristic of a locked fault accumulating strain toward a
future large earthquake. In contrast, stresses in the surrounding regions
are calculated to have increased by transfer from Lake Hamana region. We
interpret that this continuous process is associated with the 2000-2004
Tokai slow slip event.
The characteristic patterns related to aseismic stress release are also
identified in the early 1980s and during 1987-1989, when slow events are
inferred to have occurred on the basis of conventional geodetic
measurements.
Revisiting the seismotectonics and taking into account the mechanical
implications of the inversion results, we argue that the fault transition
zone between a deep stable creeping zone and a locked zone undergoes
episodic creep and plays an important role in the transfer of stress to the
locked zone. Consequently, even though we speculate that the current
(2000-to-present-day) silent slip event might be one of the repeating
events, the inferred enlargement of the stress releasing area is
significant and possibly raises the likelihood of the next Tokai
earthquake.
|